There’s a point when
you start to realize that the Bible may not always be told in strict
chronological order. I reached that
moment in Genesis 20. After all the
storytelling of Abraham and Sarah’s promise that they would have a son in their
old age, suddenly we’re given a story that is almost an exact repeat of their
experience in Egypt.
While Abraham and Sarah
travelled, they “journeyed from thence toward the south country…and dwelled in
Gerar. And Abraham said of Sarah his
wife, She is my sister: and Abimelech king of Gerar sent, and took Sarah.” (Gen. 20:1-2)
The story itself is
very interesting. Abimelech never
touches Sarah, but while he kept her in his house, he was visited by God and
told that he was a dead man for taking another man’s wife. A curse is put on him and all the women in
his household, where none of them can have children. Abimelech returns Sarah to Abraham, along
with many treasures and permission to dwell in any part of his kingdom as
recompense for taking her. Abimelech
does censure Sarah for her part in deceiving him, but by the end, all is well
and he and all the women in his house are healed.
The reason I’m sure
that this takes place before the promise of Isaac’s birth is that Sarah is 90
years old when she conceives. Somehow, I
don’t see Abimelech kidnapping an old lady who passed menopause years
before. I’m willing to admit I could be
wrong and this is still chronologically correct. But when I look at the placement, this seems
more like a backstory to help explain their relationship with Abimelech in
future events; after Isaac is born, Abraham has a property dispute over a well
with Abimelech’s servants. It gets
solved calmly by both men, and I think a lot of that has to do with their prior
experience with each other.
Well, anyways, Sarah
has Isaac, and it’s quite a miracle, what with both her and Abraham’s age.
“And Sarah said, God
hath made me to laugh, so that all that hear will laugh with me. And she said, Who would have said unto
Abraham, that Sarah should have given children suck? for I have born him a son
in his old age?” (Gen. 21:6-7)
As I wrote in my last
“Sarah” post, “laugh” can be interpreted as “rejoice,” which I actually prefer,
as it eliminates some confusion “laugh” has engendered among other people. “Rejoice” also packs a punch of sheer exultation
in this moment of Sarah’s life.
There was a problem,
though: Hagar and her son, Ishmael. Last
week, I mentioned how Hagar was cruel towards Sarah, and even though she
eventually returned and submitted herself, I imagine she must have been bitter
ever since. Her bitterness towards Sarah
would have been noticed by Ishmael, and emulated by her.
“And Sarah saw the son
of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking.” (Gen. 21:9)
That’s a little
vague. What or who was Ishmael
mocking? We get insight into this from
the apostle Paul, who in his epistle to the Galatians spoke about Isaac and
Ishmael. “Now we, brethren, as Isaac
was, are the children of promise. But as
then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the
Spirit, even so it is now.” (Gal. 4:28-29)
Ishmael was
persecuting, or attacking or troubling, his half-brother Isaac, who was 14
years younger than him. Ishmael was a
danger to Isaac, and Sarah acted to make sure that her son was safe. “Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out
this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir
with my son, even with Isaac.” (Gen. 21:10)
Abraham struggled with
this one, and you can feel for him.
Ishmael was his son and he loved him dearly. But “God said unto Abraham, Let it not be
grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all
that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy
seed be called.” (Gen. 21:12)
Sarah might seem harsh,
urging her husband to exile Hagar and their son, but bear in mind that the Lord
fully supported her decision. In this
case, she was perfectly in tune with what the Lord’s will was. Ishmael was not only a danger, he was not the
heir the Lord chose. We get insight into
this from Paul in the above scripture, when he said that Ishmael was born after
the flesh but Isaac was born after the Spirit.
Ishmael was born because Sarah decided to solve her and Abraham’s lack
of children her way. It was her decision
to give Hagar to Abraham. But the Lord
was the one who brought about Isaac’s birth.
The Lord showed through Sarah’s barrenness and old age that he commanded
miracles and that he was in charge over every aspect of their lives and
blessings. Also, Isaac’s miraculous birth
to Sarah in her old age can be viewed as a type of Christ’s miraculous birth to
Mary. The Lord uses all things to
testify of his divinity.
On top of that, because
of this, Sarah remains an inspirational figure for us today simply by seeing
her faith. Paul would testify, “Through
faith also Sara herself received strength to conceive seed, and was delivered
of a child when she was past age, because she judged him faithful who had
promised.” (Heb. 11:11)
I don’t believe the
miracle of Isaac’s birth would have happened if Sarah had not had the faith
necessary for it. But because she
believed, the Lord worked the miracle, and the testimony of that has carried
out after all these millennia.
Sarah was 127 when she
died, and “Sarah died in Kirjath-arba; the same is Hebron in the land of
Canaan: and Abraham came to mourn for Sarah, and to weep for her.” (Gen. 23:2)
As wealthy as Abraham
was, he was effectively a nomad, and though the Lord had promised him that his
posterity would possess the land of Canaan, that time was yet still in the
future. At that time, Abraham had no
land to bury his dead. There is a rather
sweet story about how he purchased some land from Ephron and the children of
Heth for 400 shekels, “the field of Ephron, which was in Machpelah, which was
before Mamre, the field, and the cave which was therein, and all the trees that
were in the field, that were in all the borders round about, were made sure
unto Abraham for a possession in the presence of the children of Heth, before
all that went in at the gather of his city.
And after this, Abraham buried Sarah his wife in the cave of the field
of Machpelah before Mamre: the same is Hebron in the land of Canaan.” (Gen.
23:17-19)
I don’t know where any
of these places are on the map, but this is significant because this would be
the place not only where Sarah would be buried, but Abraham, and later their
children and grandchildren. This cave
may be one of the holiest sites in ancient scripture, the resting place for
these holy men and women whose faith has carried on after all this time and
will carry on through eternity.
I don't think "rejoice" is correct. I've always liked the story in Gen 18:9-15, where Sarah laughs because she thinks the idea that she will conceive is ridiculous, and then tries to lie about it--but the Lord knows.
ReplyDeleteI do think you're right about the chronology though. The idea that he took a 90-year-old woman always bothered me.
It may be so. I suspect I may be in the minority of my "rejoice" opinion even in my own denomination. I arrived at this, though, because of the footnotes in my King James Version. There are a couple instances in the Abraham and Sarah story where the word "laugh" is said to come from the Hebrew root "tzachak," which means both "to laugh" and "to rejoice." I've chosen to apply the latter interpretation for the whole story whenever I see "laugh" in their tale. Again, though, I'm completely willing to admit I'm in the minority all around.
Delete