Monday, December 30, 2013

Once Upon a Time

I have nothing against fan fiction.  I grew up on the Star Wars movies and when I realized that there were several different authors writing in the Star Wars universe, I was snapping up as many novels as I could make time for.  Han and Leia’s three kids are just as much a part of the story in my mind as any other character, and Mara Jade remains the perfect girl for Luke.  (I am going to be heartbroken if in the next trilogy, they decide to leave the kids out.)

The thing about fan fiction, though, is that it’s a pretty exclusive club.  If you’re not a fan of the original works, you will find yourself very lost, very quickly.  It’s why I never read more than a couple Star Trek novels.  I was vaguely familiar with the characters, but they were all having adventures that I barely understood or related to.  Eventually, I left most fan fiction alone, including Star Wars.  See, the other thing about fan fiction is that there is little cohesion or connectedness between each author’s take on that universe.  They have their tale to tell about each character with little relation to another author’s story.  Each author can be telling an equally cool tale, but any character development one author gives can be completely forgotten by the next author’s story that takes place one year later.  It’s like having a permanent reset button for each tale.  Not ideal.

So I left it all alone: Star Wars, Star Trek, Forgotten Realms, Warhammer, StarCraft, Dungeons & Dragons, the whole shebang.  I’m only aware of these titles because of my work at Barnes & Noble; after shelving that many books daily, they start to stick in your mind.

I do make one exception: fairy tales.

Everybody grows up with fairy tales, and all these retellings of our favorite childhood stories are fan fiction, pure and simple.  And since there’s no copyright (as far as I’m aware) we’re allowed to enjoy these favorite characters and plots in as many varieties as we care to.

I haven’t just read or seen different fairy tales, one of my first short stories was a reboot of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.”  (It’s still one I’m quite proud of, despite the warts in it.)

Cinderalla has hundreds of incarnations, and a couple of them start to reach towards my list of greats.  Gail Carson Levine’s Ella Enchanted and the movie Ever After feature prominently in my mind.

But perhaps the true creativity is explored in stories that bring the fairy tales into the modern world.  The TV miniseries The 10th Kingdom was pretty cheesy but still a lot of fun, and despite the meandering through the middle, the plot was well-planned out and earned its climax.  I’ve written a couple times about how much I love the gritty and epic Fables comics.

With my penchant for the fairy re-tales, you’d think that I would have been one of the first to watch Once Upon a Time.  Instead, I waited until this Christmas; then I was on Netflix and for the next three days, I did nothing but watch that show until the second season’s finale.

I’m kicking myself for waiting this long because Once Upon a Time is making a bid to be the best of the fairy re-tales, if not ever, then definitely for the small screen.  The idea is simple: Regina (the evil queen who poisoned Snow White) placed a curse on all our traditional fairy tales.  The curse wiped out all of their memories and brought them to our world.  The now live in a town called Storybrooke that nobody can leave and time is frozen so that they don’t age and remain Regina’s blissfully unaware prisoners.

It’s the perfect except for one catch: Snow White and Prince Charming’s daughter, Emma, escaped the curse as an infant and she’s been brought to Storybrooke to break the spell and free everybody in town.
What shocked me is how horribly addicting this program is.  And perhaps I should amend this being a fairy re-tale; because ABC is this show’s station, Once Upon a Time is a Disney fairy re-tale.  The dwarfs are named Doc, Grumpy, etc., and Mulan shows up in season two.

I am a huge fan of the casting decisions: Lana Parilla as Regina is sheer perfection as the queen who has a concept of what good is but constantly lies to herself that her crimes are justified; Jennifer Morrison, Ginnifer Goodwin, and Josh Dallas convinced me as the family and individuals of Emma, Snow White, and Charming. 

But the true gem is Robert Carlyle as Rumplestiltskin.  Creepy and loveable do not belong in the same sentence, and yet that is how I feel about his character.  Unbeknownst to everyone, including Regina, he has pulled all the strings for his own selfish ends, ruined countless lives, and yet, as the series goes on, you find that all the double-dealing, crimes, and plots has all been to correct one mistake he made as a young father.  And thanks to Belle (played gorgeously by Emilie de Ravin) he starts on the path of redemption, and the shock for me is that I really believe that he might change to the good side.

(And when I say Belle loves him, you are to understand that Rumplestiltskin is the Beast of that fairy tale—and also, it turns out, the Crocodile who took Captain Hook’s hand.  That’s a fun story there.)

I can’t wait to start on the third season.  The heroes go to Neverland and have to deal the villainous Peter Pan; I am excited.

For all the praise, though, I have one serious complaint and it still may keep me from watching the rest.  Lana Parilla has done an amazing job with the character of Regina, but the writers have ruined her.  Regina is evil and manipulative, and despite her few attempts to change her nature, she never learns her lesson and plots to harm or kill everyone around her.  Despite all that, the good guys keep giving her another chance.  A chance she never asks for and spurns every time it’s offered.

This is completely influenced by Star Wars.  Darth Vader lives a life of murder and mayhem, but because in the end, he saves his son, that somehow redeems his soul to where he is on the same level as Yoda, Obi-Wan, and all the little children he sliced up in Revenge of the Sith.  I call bullsh—.  Regina is just the same as Vader, and she might be even worse.  She places curses, rips out hearts, falsely imprisons, wages war, and gives orders to kill entire towns in her own kingdom; yet when she’s finally caught and put on trial, Snow White lets her go because she believes Regina “still has good in her.”

I have a hard time believing that that’s true; actions are the fruit of what’s in our hearts.  Bad people can become good, but only when they replace what’s inside.  But assume Snow White is correct, so what?  At the end of the day, setting an unrepentant mass murderer free in your own country is so negligent in your responsibilities as a ruler that any crimes the murderer commits are now also on your hands.


This is such a black mark that if the writers don’t learn from their mistake and realize that Regina has worn out her welcome on this show, I may yet stop watching this show.  And that would be a shame because there is brilliance in this show that could make it one of the best stories of our decade.

6 comments:

  1. :) I wrote a post about Once Upon a Time when it first started. It made such an impression on me--the re-fashioning of old tales, the casting, the warm moments that made my eyes tear up. Great stuff. As far as Regina goes, season 3 may surprise you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe, but frankly, I'm not convinced. Regina is in the middle of the black hole in my heart that sucks in all characters who must die in order for me to be happy, but that wasn't the only thing that got me. The standard of morality still strikes me as false and it has to do with Snow White killing Cora.

      I mean, we've seen Snow White's past. Earlier, she was thieving, going to war, and at the start of season 2 when she and Emma end up in the Enchanted Forest, she's killing ogres and threatening Mulan and Aurora with her knife. As violence goes, she's not squeaky clean. And yet, when she tricks Regina into killing Cora (who was a legitimate threat, not just to her family, but for every citizen in Storybrooke--they were at war and that woman needed to die) somehow that magically created a darkness in her heart. How is that possible considering her past? Is killing wrong, even in war? If so, that would mean Snow should have had that dark spot when killing the ogres and all those soldiers in the one story when she and the dwarfs invaded King George's castle. Is it because she was dishonest? If that's the case, then the moral universe here puts honesty above life; Snow White's sin isn't that she killed Cora but that she used deception to do it. And yet, that doesn't make sense because everybody has lied to Henry multiple times, not to mention the ridiculous love triangles that fraught everyone in season 1--I'm not knocking those; I found them quite entertaining, but the point is that dishonesty and secrets is such a common practice in this show that Snow's heart should have had a dark spot long before now.

      I guess my complaint isn't really about Regina or Snow White (although I still Regina must be held accountable at some point for her crimes, which she never has been and that continues to be a moral failing on all the good guys' parts) but that the writers are inconsistent in their moral universe. There is no standard in what's truly right or wrong. Moral complexity (which I enjoy) happens because the standard is solid and clear but the people are not. With Once Upon a Time, the moral standard seems as wishy-washy and driven by emotion as the people are, so really, there is no true morality or standard for them to live up to. It makes for a dysfunctional society at best and a chaotic universe at worst. Either way, I wish the writers had thought this through much more beforehand.

      Delete
  2. So I sympathize with your critique of "Once Upon a Time." The first season remains the best. I'm watching the Neverland season, but I'm not excited about it.

    Anyway, one of my ideas about "fan fiction" is to correct the mistakes I feel the original authors made. Of course, what's a mistake is subjective, and I'm not a famous author by any stretch of the imagination, but if you haven't read it yet, I'd be pleased if you'd take a look at my only foray into fan fic (so far, at least): https://www.fanfiction.net/s/9139595/1/Memoirs-of-a-Sith-Lord

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I liked it. I was kind of surprised--not because of your writing; I've critiqued one of your novels before. I know you're capable. It's mostly because, as much as I grew up and adored "Star Wars," I've really gotten tired of the franchise. "The Empire Strikes Back" and, for reasons I don't entirely understand, "Revenge of the Sith," are the only ones I can watch without laughing hysterically.

      I really like what you did with Padme. Darkening her is completely against "Star Wars" mythos, but it feels much truer. Not that I didn't buy there could be a good queen Padme, I just could never buy that good queen falling for the dark, brooding Anakin. This Padme and Anakin have a romance I believe in. That's your real achievement with this short. You made me believe a relationship that I've sneered at for several years.

      Delete
  3. Thanks. It was what I was shooting for. Well, that and making Jar Jar more tolerable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jar-Jar was a noble effort, but sadly, I cannot separate your characterization from the vision Lucas left blazing in my mind. The Gungan is forever tainted to me.

      Delete