Teaching literature is difficult, especially around the high
school stage. This is because most
teenagers have lives, they want to be social, and reading is about as nonsocial
an activity as they come.
I currently belong to a book group, and we have had many
invigorating and wonderful discussions about the books we read together, but
the fact is, it’s only social after
we’re done with whatever we picked for the month. The reading part is as lonely as it gets.
I read all through school, and while I would participate in
several different activities, most of my time was occupied with my nose in a
book. It wasn’t rare to find me walking
to class with a paperback in one hand and almost walking into a tree as I went
to the next period. I spent a lot of
time by myself.
Most teenagers are not me.
They want social lives and they’re pretty good at getting them,
too. Why do they want to read when it
cuts into the most important aspect of their lives?
Besides, which, a lot of the books teachers assign can be downright
horrible for two reasons: One, the book really is bad; or two, the book is
confusing and they don’t understand why it’s important that they spend so many
weeks involved with these various stories.
I’ve never forgotten a conversation we had my freshman
year. We had just finished John
Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men and were
discussing the ending. Before this, we
had read Romeo and Juliet, and we
understood that the next book coming up was going to be William Goldman’s Lord of the Flies. One of the girls in my class had had it.
“Why are we reading so many books about death? This doesn’t make me happy. It just makes me feel depressed.”
“I hate to break it to you,” our teacher said, “but people
die.”
That was the weakest answer to the best question ever asked
the whole time I was in school. Yeah,
people die; we knew that. We were
teenagers for crying out loud; several of us already had relatives that passed
on, myself included. Why did that mean
we had to read it?
I’m not going to answer that question in this post, although
I may try in the future. I just give
this as an example of the disconnect students have in understanding the purpose
behind the classics and why they should read.
I sure didn’t get the point behind Of
Mice and Men until a couple years later, and by then, I found other
Steinbeck novels I much preferred over that one (Cannery Row I will recommend to anyone.)
I switched high schools my junior year, and they did
something rather incredible: they combined English class with History. There was still a lot of grouching (did you
expect anything else?) but the complaint I never heard was, Why is this important?
Because it was American history, the books we read would
correlate with the time period we were studying. During the Colonial Era, we were reading
short stories like “Rip Van Winkle” and after, Benjamin Franklin’s
autobiography. For the Civil War, it was
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,
one of the best books I’ve ever read.
For the Roarin’ Twenties, The
Great Gatsby. Great Depression, The Grapes of Wrath. McCarthy Era, The Crucible.
And I could go on.
Now, I’m confident that most of my classmates still didn’t read any of
our assigned literature. But when it
came time to talk about it, nobody could argue that they didn’t see the
point. We were discussing and learning
how each book was relevant to our American culture, why it had lasted so long,
and what we could still learn about ourselves in those books today.
***
All of this is my usual meandering to come to this point:
Books matter because of the impact they have on our culture. They comment on societies, force us to look
at ourselves, occasionally, they will even create new cultures and new ways of
behavior.
Some books are easier to understand because they’re part of
our culture, or our shared experiences.
The reason Harry Potter became
such a phenomenon, partly because it’s a fun and charming fantasy, but
moreover, it was very familiar to our own experiences. We could relate to difficult families,
school, sports, awe of nature, the shops, vacations, the politics, the social
ladders, and yes, that battle of good versus evil and coming to terms with the
meaning of life and death.
I had a lot more I wanted to say, but it didn’t come together
well when I wrote it down. So I’ll just close
saying that I don’t know how to instill
the love of reading in another person, but I feel that progress could be made
in teaching literature if the students can be told and shown the cultural
context behind the work, and how it has made us the people we are today.
No comments:
Post a Comment