Three of the books had mixed genders in their
groups, but one ended up being all-boy and the other was all-girl. I ended up in the all-boy group reading Erich
Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western
Front, which was the best book I read that year and is still among my
favorite war novels.
The all-girl group read The Color Purple by Alice Walker, and when I read it this past
week, I can’t help but be surprised that the teacher permitted these 14-year-old
ladies to read it. The first ten pages
aren’t even done before we find that the narrator, Celie, has been raped and
had two children from her dad. And that’s
just the start; Walker delves into lesbian sex and extramarital affairs, and is
unsparing in looking at all kinds of home abuse imaginable.
I’m not being an entire prude here. I’m genuinely confused. See, the next year, we would have a
sex-education week, where we would go into all about sex is, the physical
implications from STDs to how your body reacts to sex, the various types of
birth control and how to properly use them, and we got to do this in lieu of
our regular biology class. If this wasn’t
the best and most entertaining week of the year, it was certainly the most
memorable.
We had to get parental permission well in advance
before this class started, and there was even a meeting for parents to oversee
what we would be learning. It strikes me
odd that there was so much red tape to cross for a sex-ed week, and yet the
year before, a group of 14-year-old girls were given one of the most erotic
novels going through the school system.
There’s a strange double-standard going on and it makes me wonder if the
teacher had read the book himself before giving it to his students.
But was it worth reading before I died? Meh.
It wasn’t the worst thing I could have done.
It’s a life story about black women over the course
of 30 years. Celie is an abused daughter
who gets trapped in an abusive marriage raising his ungrateful brats, and she
doesn’t get out of it until Shug (a very popular showgirl and someone Celie
fell for) gets her out of the situation, and then is left alone when Shug
becomes a cougar and chases after a significantly younger man.
If you’ve been reading my previous posts, you’d know
that the content here is not too edgy for me.
This story got old fast, though, and part of it may be an audience
disconnect. Celie is man hater (her most
repeated phrase is, “Y’all are just frogs to me.”) and being a man myself, even though I
completely understand that men in her life have been awful, it was difficult
for me to feel any sort of bond to her.
There are very few cases where I’m invested in a story but not in the
protagonist.
There are two things going for this novel: the first
is Celie’s sister, Nettie. The Color Purple is an epistolary novel,
composed mostly of letters that Celie writes to God and then later to her
sister, Nettie. Midway through, we start
reading letters from Nettie, telling her story of being a missionary to Africa,
the strange and wonderful circumstances that brought her there and the
adventures she’s had in educating the Olinka tribe and the family she creates
there.
Nettie’s story is filled with pain but also with
great love. You see the pain she goes
through in helping to raise a couple children, as well as having to watch the
Olinka tribe disintegrate because of the march of modern industrialism. This is a theme I’ve come to care about a lot
in recent years, how the worship of money undermines the true value of the
earth. It’s heartbreaking to see their
simple homes with banana leaf roofs be replaced by these monstrous cages of tin
and forced into laboring for the invading company.
The other thing is a conversation Celie has with
Shug about God. Celie has become an
Atheist because in her view, if God is there then He is too lazy or selfish to
come down and fix the things that are wrong with the world. It’s the age-old question of “why do bad
things happen to good people?” which is really asking, “Why does God let the
bad things happen?”
I don’t agree with all of Shug’s answer. Not by a long shot. But the dialogue is real and it’s completely
understandable how each character would choose to see God in the way that they
do. In a way, the real story wasn’t
about Celie dealing with her relations or racism or even the search for love,
it was about her finding faith in something higher, even though it seems to go
unrewarded. The last chapter
encapsulates gratitude very well indeed.
It’s not a bad book.
I just found it too ham-fisted and emotionally, it felt like I was being
pushed away rather than welcomed into the story.
I do have a stylistic quibble, and it’s strictly for
lit geeks: would it have killed her to use quotation marks?
This is a convention of James Joyce, the seeming
father of the modern literary elite.
Joyce, for reasons I cannot fathom, hated quotation marks. He found those “little squiggles” repugnant
and unnecessary, that somehow they disrupted the flow of narration and that
readers should notice when a character is speaking and when the narrator is
talking. Alice Walker clearly agreed
with him because there is not a quote mark in sight.
And it drives me nuts. Quotation marks aren’t useless, they’re
helpful. In a way, they signify action
in literature. In movies, if they want
to give you a sense of motion, they move the camera around instead of keeping
it in one fixed place. In books, quote
marks are the writer’s way of moving the camera around. They signify people talking, that action is
going on, and I notice that I tend to read faster and am more engaged with
dialogue than I am with any other part of a story.
It’s also helpful in distinguishing between
something spoken and something that’s just a thought. I’m so happy that most people in the world don’t
even know about this ridiculous tradition.
Of course, most people in the world don’t really like to read, so… not
that they’re going to care anyway.
Wow! I have never read a book without quotation marks. Why make a story any harder to read though!
ReplyDeleteThat is bizarre. I'd have to try writing without quotation marks, but it sounds like it would be rather difficult to write dialogue without them. Yikes!
ReplyDeleteThought provoking. I have not read this book. I don't know that I will now though. I do however, find it fascinating how one individual can take what life offers and use it to grow and deepen their compassion and understanding of others, and another will allow what happens to them to shut them off from growth and become bitter and antagonistic towards God. I have had times of both emotions and it seems life just goes better looking for the meaning and purpose of adversity and pain..
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis was just a double post. Nothing inappropriate or anything like that.
Delete