Sadly, while isn’t dead in these modern days, it has
been crippled in our generation. It’s
not really taught in schools, and even when it is, modern poetry tends to try
and be the complete opposite of what the classics were. Rhyme and meter are talked about, but every
English or writing class I took regarded them as nice tools but could be easily
set aside and forgotten. And that’s just
sad. Meter and rhyme are the two
elements that make poetry special and give it that music that’s so memorable
and meaningful to us. It is my opinion
that good poetry has to have at least one of those elements; otherwise, it’s
not really poetry at all.
For me, the more difficult of the two is meter,
which is a real shame because meter is what gives rhythm to the body of your
work. For those who may not know what
meter is, let me show you by one of the most famous opening lines for a poem
ever:
“Once u/pon a/ midnight/ dreary,/ while I/ pondered,/ weak and/ weary,” (“The Raven” by Edgar Allen
Poe)
If you study carefully this poem, you’ll see that
the entire poem follows a certain rhythm, or a pattern of one stressed syllable
followed by an unstressed syllable. This
stressed-unstressed meter is called a trochee.
Most of the poem is written in trochaic octameter, which means that
there are eight trochees in a line, as I’ve tried to show with the slashes
above.
“Shall I/
compare/ thee to/ a sum/mer’s day?” (“Sonnet XVIII” by William
Shakespeare)
This is a whole new type of meter called iambic
pentameter. An iamb is the opposite of a
trochee, in that it follows an unstressed-stressed syllable pattern. Pentameter means the iamb occurs five times
in a line.
As I said, this is much harder for me in crafting
poetry, and it’s something I hope to work on in the coming months. Rhyming is simple for me; I’ve been doing it
for years. But for now, that’s become
secondary because I really want to master this particular element, as you might
observe from yesterday’s poem, in which I didn’t bother to rhyme at all but I
was trying to establish a rhythm using an iambic hexameter.
Just a note for anyone who cares: I really liked how
I did with iambs. Just reading over it
again, there’s one or two spots where it feel apart, but overall, I kept to the
rhythm pretty well. If I could do it
over again, though, I would not have done a hexameter. Doing a straight pentameter, or even a mix of
pentameter and tetrameter, would have tightened my sentences and helped me
convey a more focused idea with fewer words.
The thing I’m learning is that longer meters are good for telling
stories, while shorter meters seem to help in conveying ideas or simple images.
No comments:
Post a Comment