Monday, October 21, 2013

The One Thing I Agree with Ayn Rand About



Ayn Rand is a marvel.  She might be the only American philosopher of note, having formed her own very persuasive philosophy of Objectivism.  And there’s no denying her talent.  I read The Fountainhead in college and last week I decided it was time to a crack at Atlas Shrugged.  I’m still not finished yet but I can already say with conviction that she was one of the most talented authors ever published in the Twentieth Century.  There is good reason for her books to still be bestsellers, even after all these years.
 
She shirks on nothing.  Her settings are vivid, the plot is clear and demanding, and her characters are always memorable.  I don’t have greatest memory for details; within a year, I tend to forget who is who in a story, especially since I don’t reread books much.  I still vividly remember the people and the drama from The Fountainhead, and I have every reason to expect that will remain true with Atlas Shrugged.  Even when they’re not complex, the characters are still strong and refuse to be ignored because of the life Ayn Rand gives them.

Her novels were told specifically to put her philosophy into practice, show it works in our world and the relationships and contentions the come with it.  She worked long and hard to make a case for her beliefs and many are still following it today.  I understand why.

It’s such a shame that everything she believed bothers me to the bone.  Her espousing the “virtue” of selfishness is the core theme in her stories, philosophy, and the way she lived her life, and the more I learn about her, the more troubled I become because I understand now how her philosophy penetrated our modern culture.  Since I was a child, I’ve listened to friends, neighbors, and even some family members make the same arguments and statements Rand makes to justify their greed and scorn for the poor.  Not that many of them, if any, would know that Rand came up with the arguments first (I sure didn’t until I read her books and watched television interviews she gave).  They don’t need to know it came from her; her philosophy penetrated our culture so well that many live it, something I’m sure would have given her no small satisfaction.

I didn’t write this just to rag on her, tempting though it was.  She gets enough attention as it is.  No, the reason I decided to write this post is because I finally found one statement I agree with completely from Atlas Shrugged, and I wanted to pick it out for my own reasons.  Here’s the statement in part:

“[D]o you know the hallmark of the second-rater?  It’s resentment of another man’s achievement…They bare their teeth at you from out of their rat holes, thinking that you take pleasure in letting your brilliance dim them—while you’d give a year of your life to see a flicker of talent anywhere among them.  They envy achievement, and their dream of greatness is a world where all men have become their acknowledged inferiors.  They don’t know that that dream is the infallible proof of mediocrity, because that sort of world is what the man of achievement would not be able to bear.”  (Atlas Shrugged, p. 358)

I have long felt that jealousy is among the ugliest of sins, and one that baffles me every time I come across it.  There’s only been one time I can recall anybody being envious of me; living an unremarkable life usually does wonders in how many things you don’t have to deal with.  I remember it being incredibly frustrating, especially because it ruined what could have been one of the greatest friendships of my life.

That’s the worst part of jealousy: it tends to be directed at the people we’re closest to.  Time and again, I’ve seen a coworker, a classmate, or a neighbor be honored for something they did, earn an award of some kind, and it becomes their friends who talk behind their back.  It’s their friends who start to ignore them, treat them like they didn’t deserve the attention, when in the end, the friends are angry that they weren’t in the spotlight.

Jealousy is the opposite of charity, for where one seeks to give and receives more in return, the other seeks to take and spends more for nothing.

No comments:

Post a Comment